George Clooney and she was accompanied

[sohanuzzaman56]

b) moms and dads of teenage babysitters? That doesn't seem like the right answer either. No parent would be happy with their teenage daughter taking care of a horny forty-something with a cold (unless it was by her mother: see previous point).

c) middle-aged women with sick husbands? Let's not forget that dad chose Frenadol over the mothers of this group (represented by the mother-in-law). An unforgivable lack of tact, in short.

d) Sick dads? The image of the dad in this ad does not make it ebay data attractive to identify with the character: he does not go to work because of a simple cold, he drools thinking about the babysitter, and ends up dancing with his mother-in-law in the next ad. A real champion, really: a real henpecked husband.

In my opinion, this advert has not been funny and very few people have been. It is not only about the many comments it has generated in some forums about whether the babysitter is a minor or not, whether this advert is playing with paedophilia, or whether it has been labelled as “pedobear” on YouTube. It is, above all, about the fact that it is not intended for the target audience. Its creators undoubtedly wanted to be funny, but they have not succeeded. Perhaps that is why it was nominated among the 5 worst adverts of 2009 by internet users.

However, it seems that they have realized this and the new campaign for the product's capsules completely changes the communication philosophy and yes, it is oriented towards its audiences in a coherent way.